Bacteriële CZS infecties

Initiatief: SWAB Aantal modules: 9

Epidemiologie en antibiotische behandeling

Uitgangsvraag

Epidemiology and empirical antibiotic treatment of community-acquired bacterial meningitis.

Aanbeveling

Empirical antibiotic therapy in neonates with bacterial meningitis should consist of amoxicillin and cefotaxime. If a microorganism is cultured, therapy can be adjusted accordingly (see module ”Antimicrobiële behandeling meningitis")

 

Empirical antibiotic therapy in children aged 1 month-16 years with bacterial meningitis should consist of a third generation cephalosporin (cefotaxime or ceftriaxone). Meropenem may be used as an alternative in specific cases (e.g. known allergic reactions). If a microorganism is cultured, therapy can be adjusted accordingly (see module ”Antimicrobiële behandeling meningitis”).

 

Empirical antibiotic therapy in adults with bacterial meningitis should consist of the combination of amoxicillin and a third generation cephalosporin (ceftriaxone or cefotaxime).

 

If a microorganism is cultured in adults with bacterial meningitis, therapy can be adjusted accordingly (see module ”Behandeling van bacteriële meningitis”). If cultures are negative after 48 hours, the third generation cephalosporin  can be discontinued, and monotherapy amoxicillin will suffice. 

Overwegingen

For this module no considerations have been formulated. 

Onderbouwing

Level 1

Early neonatal meningitis is most commonly caused by S. agalactiaeE. coli, and L. monocytogenes. Late neonatal meningitis is most commonly caused by staphylococci, and Gram-negative bacilli

 

A2 Garges (2006)13, Holt (2001)15, NRLBM (2011)20 B Hristeva (1993)14

 

Level 2

Bacterial meningitis in children is caused by S. pneumoniae (44%), N. meningitidis (39%) and H. influenzae (11%)

 

A2 NRLBM20

 

 

Level 2

Bacterial meningitis in adults is caused by S. pneumoniae (62%), N. meningitidis (23%) L. monocytogens (5%) and H. influenzae (3%)

 

A2 NRLBM20

 

 

Level 3

Cefotaxime and meropenem are equally effective as empirical therapy for bacterial meningitis in children. However, meropenem should only be given in specific cases and kept as last resort.

 

B Odio (1999)21

 

 

*

No comparative studies have been performed to evaluate empirical antibiotic therapy regimens for community-acquired bacterial meningitis in neonates and adults.

What is the epidemiology and optimal empirical antibiotic therapy of bacterial meningitis in the Netherlands in neonates (0-28 days)?

Common causative microorganisms of neonatal meningitis during the first week of life are Streptococcus agalactiae (Group B streptococci), Escherichia coli, and Listeria monocytogenes (Supplementary table 1).6,13-15 Late-onset neonatal meningitis is formally classified as meningitis after the first week until the 28thday of life.13,16,17 Late-onset neonatal meningitis may be caused by a wide variety of species, including staphylococci, and Gram-negative bacilli.6  Children born with a hydrocephalus or those that develop a hydrocephalus after an intraventricular bleeding (on the neonatal intensive care unit) are often treated with repetitive CSF drainage from an Ommaya reservoir, or a temporary or permanent CSF shunt and are at increased risk of nosocomial meningitis.4,18 The causative microorganisms in these children are different from those in “spontaneous” meningitis and are similar to those seen in nosocomial meningitis (module “Epidemiologie van nosocomiale en posttraumatische bacteriële meningitis”).

 

Empirical therapy for neonatal meningitis should consist of amoxicillin combined with cefotaxime (Table 1). The use of gentamicin to cover neonatal meningitis due to Gram-negative bacteria has been debated. The recommendation for the addition of gentamicin has been based on data from in vitro studies, which showed synergistic activity with amoxicillin in antimicrobial killing of S. agalactiae.6,19However, as CSF concentrations are usually only minimally above the MIC, third generation cephalosporins are considered superior to gentamicin.17 In neonates with suspected sepsis gentamicin is combined with amoxicillin, but physicians should be aware this regimen is sub-optimal for meningitis treatment. In neonates with suspected sepsis or meningitis CSF examination to establish whether concurrent meningitis is present is vital to determine the optimal empirical treatment. We recommend amoxicillin and cefotaxime in children with a high suspicion of bacterial meningitis. The dose is depends on gestational age and birth weight, and is given in the online SWAB-ID (www.swab.nl). Ceftriaxone is contraindicated in children < 4 weeks because of a high risk of precipitation of calcium-ceftriaxone complexes in the gallbladder. 

 

Table 1 Causative organisms of bacterial meningitis in neonates 

Data source

Garges (2006)13

Holt (2001)15

Hristeva (1993)14

NRLBM

Total

Country

US

UK

UK

NL

 

Age

0-150 days (NICU)

2-28 days

0-28 days

0-28 days

 

Study period

1997-2004

1996-1997

1984-1991

2005-2010

 

Gram-positive

Streptococcus agalactiae

 

37

 

69

 

7

 

71

 

178 (54%)

Streptococcus mitis

0

0

1

0

1 (0.3%)

Listeria monocytogenes

1

7

1

1

10 (3.0%)

Streptococcus pneumoniae

2

8

0

3

13 (3.9%)

Gram-positive cocci (not specified)

12

0

0

0

12 (3.6%)

Enterococcus spp.

6

0

0

0

6 (1.8%)

Staphylococcus aureus

4

0

0

1

5 (1.5%)

Other Gram-positive bacteria (not specified) 0

17

0

2

19 (5.7%)

Gram-negative

 

 

 

 

 

 

Haemophilus influenzae

2

1

0

0

3 (0.9%)

 

Escherichia coli

12

26

0

25

57 (15.7%)

 

Enterobacter spp.

4

0

0

0

4 (1.2%)

 

Serratia spp.

2

0

1

0

3 (0.9%)

 

Acinetobacter spp.

3

0

0

0

3 (0.9%)

 

Pseudomonas spp.

3

0

1

0

4 (1.2%)

 

Proteus spp.

1

0

0

0

1 (0.3%)

 

Citrobacter spp.

1

0

0

0

1 (0.3%)

 

Salmonella spp.

1

0

0

1

2 (0.6%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SWAB Guidelines Bacterial CNS Infections

Neisseria spp.

2

5

0

0

7 (2.1%)

Klebsiella spp.

0

0

2

0

2 (0.3%)

Achromobacter xylosoxidans

0

0

1

0

1 (0.3%)

Other Gram-negative bacteria

0

11

1

7

19 (5.7%)

Total

93

144

15

111

363

 

 

What is the epidemiology and optimal empirical antibiotic therapy of bacterial meningitis in the Netherlands for children (29 days – 16 years)?

The most common causative bacteria of community-acquired bacterial meningitis in children aged 1 month and older are S. pneumoniae and N. meningitidis, causing 80% of cases in the Netherlands (Supplementary table 2). The remainder of cases is caused by group B streptococci, E. coli, H. influenzae, other Gram-negative bacilli, L. monocytogenes, and group A streptococci. The epidemiology has shifted substantially in the past 10 years and is still changing due to the introduction of the meningococcus group C vaccine (2002), and the 7- (2006) and 10valent (2011) pneumococcal conjugate vaccines.6 

Empirical coverage with a third generation cephalosporin (cefotaxime or ceftriaxone) is recommended based on a broad spectrum of activity and excellent penetration into the CSF under inflammatory conditions. Third generation cephalosporins are preferred in this age group above amoxicillin as resistance of H. influenzae to amoxicillin due to beta-lactamase production occurs in 11% of meningitis cases.20 A clinical trial comparing cefotaxime with meropenem showed similar efficacy; therefore meropenem may be considered as alternative empirical treatment in children >3 months of age in specific cases (e.g. cephalosporin allergy).21 However, the committee recommends keeping the use of meropenem restricted to the use as last resort antibiotic in bacterial meningitis patients.

Table 2 Causative organisms of bacterial meningitis in children aged 29 days-16 years

 

Data source                                NRLBM

Study period                                2005-2010

Gram-positive bacteria

 

Streptococcus pneumoniae 

305 (43.6%)

Streptococcus agalactiae

9 (1.3%)

Streptococcus pyogenes

14 (2.0%)

Streptococcus sanguinis

1 (0.1%)

“α-haemolytic” streptococcus

1 (0.1%)

Staphylococcus aureus

4 (0.6%)

 Staphylococcus lugdunensis

1 (0.1%)

Staphylococcus capitis

1 (0.1%)

Staphylococcus epidermidis 

2 (0.3%)

 

Coagulase-negative staphylococcus 1 (0.1%)

Listeria monocytogenes                 3 (0.4%)

Gram-negative bacteria

 

Neisseria meningitidis

271 (38.8%)

Haemophilus influenzae

76 (10.9%)

Escherichia coli

10 (1.4%)

Total

699 (100.0%)

 

 

What is the epidemiology and optimal empirical antibiotic therapy of bacterial meningitis in the Netherlands for adults (> 16 years)

All causative organisms of bacterial meningitis in adults from two nation-wide prospective cohort studies in the Netherlands, including 1500 patients, are presented in Supplementary table 3. S. pneumoniae is the most common causative microorganism of adult bacterial meningitis, and was identified in 70% of culture positive cases included between 2006 and 2010.22N. meningitidis was the second most common causative microorganism and is predominantly found in young adults.23 The proportion of meningococcal meningitis decreased from 37% of bacterial meningitis cases between 1998-2002 to 16% in 2006-2010, probably due to vaccination against serogroup C and to normal variation in meningococcal disease incidence. Patients over 50 years of age and those with an immunocompromised state are at increased risk for Listeria monocytogenes, which is found in 5% of cases.24However, L. monocytogenes meningitis also occurs in previously healthy adults without risk factors (Supplementary table 4). Therefore age and immunocompromised status cannot be used to rule out L. monocytogenes meningitis. Meningitis due to mostly unencapsulated H. influenzae and group A streptococci occurs in 3-4% of cases. Other causative organisms occur sporadically.

 

There have been no randomized controlled trials or comparative studies to evaluate the optimal empirical antibiotic treatment in adults with bacterial meningitis. Therefore all recommendations are based on epidemiological data (level 4 evidence – expert opinion). 

 

The committee recommends empirical therapy for bacterial meningitis in adults to consist of amoxicillin and a third generation cephalosporin (ceftriaxone or cefotaxime). Use of these antibiotics will ensure coverage of the four most common causative microorganisms (pneumococci, N. meningitidis, L. monocytogenes and H. influenzae) and most sporadic causes. This combination therapy is preferred over monotherapy with third generation cephalosporins, as this does not cover L. monocytogenes, while monotherapy with amoxicillin does not cover β-lactamase producing H. influenzae strains and E.coli.

 

In the majority of patients the CSF or blood cultures will show the causative microorganism within 48 hours, with the exception of L. monocytogenes which is a notably slow grower.6If a microorganism is cultured, therapy can be adjusted accordingly (see module "Behandeling van bacteriële meningitis"). If cultures are negative after 48 hours, the third generation cephalosporins can be discontinued, and monotherapy with amoxicillin will suffice because infection with β-lactamase producing H. influenzae is virtually excluded. 

 

Table 3 Causative organisms in 1500 episodes of culture-proven community-acquired bacterial meningitis in adults

Data source

DBMS10

MeninGene11

 

Study period

1998-2002

2006-2010

Total (%)

Gram-positive bacteria

Streptococcus pneumoniae

 

352

 

582

 

934 (62.3%)

Streptococcus pyogenes

6

11

17 (1.1%)

Streptococcus agalactiae

5

9

14 (0.9%)

Streptococcus constellatus

1

0

1 (0.1%)

Streptococcus milleri

0

1

1 (0.1%)

Streptococcus parasanguinis

0

1

1 (0.1%)

Streptococcus oralis

1

1

2 (0.1%)

Streptococcus suis

4

5

9 (0.6%)

Streptococcus salivarius

2

2

4 (0.3%)

Streptococcus bovis

1

2

3 (0.2%)

Streptococcus equi

1

3

4 (0.3%)

Streptococcus mitis

1

2

3 (0.2%)

Group G Streptococcus

1

1

2 (0.1%)

Streptococcus (not specified)

1

2

3 (0.2%)

Enterococcus faecalis

0

2

2 (0.1%)

Staphylococcus aureus

9

12

21 (1.4%)

Staphylococcus epidermidis

1

0

1 (0.1%)

Listeria monocytogenes

30

42

72 (4.8%)

Gram-negative bacteria

Neisseria meningitidis

 

257

 

91

 

348 (23.2%)

Haemophilus influenzae

14

26

40 (2.7%)

Haemophilus parainfluenzae

1

1

2 (0.1%)

Escherichia coli

4

7

11 (0.7%)

Klebsiella pneumoniae

1

1

2 (0.1%)

Salmonella enteritidis

0

1

1 (0.1%)

Capnocytophaga canimorsus

0

1

1 (0.1%)

Pseudomonas aeruginosa 

0

1

1 (0.1%)

Total

693

807

1500 (100%)

 

Table 4 Causative organisms in culture-proven community-acquired bacterial meningitis in adults aged 17-50 without risk factors.

Data source

MeninGene11

 

Study period

2005-2010

 

Study group

17-50    years no risk factorsa 

old,

Gram-positive bacteria

Streptococcus pneumoniae

 

96 (52.4%)

 

Streptococcus pyogenes

6 (3.3%)

 

Streptococcus agalactiae

3 (1.6%)

 

Streptococcus suis

3 (1.6%)

 

Streptococcus equi

2 (1.1%)

 

Streptococcus mitis

1 (0.5%)

 

Staphylococcus aureus

2 (1.1%)

 

Listeria monocytogenes

3 (1.6%)

 

Gram-negative bacteria

Neisseria meningitidis

 

59 (32.2%)

 

Haemophilus influenzae

7 (3.8%)

 

Mixedb

2 (1.1%)

 

Total

183

 

 

aRisk factors: recent head injury, cerebrospinal fluid leak, diabetes mellitus, immunosuppressive therapy, splenectomy, infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). 

bStreptococcus equi + Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Streptococcus milleri + Fusobacterium nucleatum.

 

Table 5 Empirical antimicrobial therapy for community-acquired bacterial Meningitis, stratified for age.

Age / risk group

Treatment                                      Alternative

Neonates*

Children

amoxicillin 100-200 mg/kg/day (6h)and cefotaxime 50-150 mg/kg/day(8h)

 

ceftriaxone 100 mg/kg/day (max 4g) 

(24h) or cefotaxime 150 mg/kg/day

(max 12g) (6h)

 

 

amoxicillin 100-200 mg/kg/day(6h) and gentamicin 4 mg/kg/day(24-

48h) meropenem 120 mg/kg/day(max 6

g) (8h)

 

 

Adults 

amoxicillin 6x2 g/dag plusceftriaxone 2x2 g/day orcefotaxime 6x2 g/day 

 

 

Dosages derived from: SWAB-ID: Nationale antibioticaboekje van de SWAB, Between brackets interval between dosages.

* Dose and dosage interval dependent on gestational age and weight, see SWAB-ID for exact recommendations.

  1. CBO. Kwaliteitsinstituut voor de Gezondheidszorg CBO, Handleiding voor werkgroepleden. http://www.cbo.nl/Downloads/222/EBRO_handl_totaal.pdf
  2. van de Beek D, Weisfelt M, de Gans J, Tunkel AR, Wijdicks EF. Drug Insight: adjunctive therapies in adults with bacterial meningitis. Nat Clin Pract Neurol 2006; 2: 504-16.
  3. van de Beek D, Brouwer MC, de Gans J et al. Richtlijn bacteriele meningitis. Utrecht: Nederlandse Vereniging voor Neurologie; 2011.
  4. van de Beek D, Drake JM, Tunkel AR. Nosocomial bacterial meningitis. N Engl J Med 2010; 362: 146-54.
  5. Bohr V, Rasmussen N, Hansen B et al. 875 cases of bacterial meningitis: diagnostic procedures and the impact of preadmission antibiotic therapy. Part III of a three-part series. J Infect 1983; 7: 193-202.
  6. Brouwer MC, Tunkel AR, van de Beek D. Epidemiology, diagnosis, and antimicrobial treatment of acute bacterial meningitis. Clin Microbiol Rev 2010; 23: 467-92.
  7. Spanos A, Harrell FE, Jr., Durack DT. Differential diagnosis of acute meningitis. An analysis of the predictive value of initial observations. JAMA 1989; 262: 2700-7.
  8. Tunkel AR. Brain abscess. In: Mandell GL, Bennett JE, Dolin R, editors. Principles and practive of infectious diseases. 7 ed. Philadelphia: Churchill livingstone; 2010. p. 1265-78.
  9. Kastenbauer S, Pfister HW, Wispelwey B, Scheld WM. Brain abscess. In: Scheld WM, Whitley RJ, Marra CM, editors. Infections of the central nervous system. 3 ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2004. p. 479-507.
  10. van de Beek D, de Gans J, Spanjaard L, Weisfelt M, Reitsma JB, Vermeulen M. Clinical features and prognostic factors in adults with bacterial meningitis. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 1849-59.
  11. Brouwer MC, Heckenberg SG, de GJ, Spanjaard L, Reitsma JB, van de Beek D. Nationwide implementation of adjunctive dexamethasone therapy for pneumococcal meningitis. Neurology 2010.
  12. van de Beek D, de Gans J, Tunkel AR, Wijdicks EF. Community-acquired bacterial meningitis in adults. N Engl J Med 2006; 354: 44-53.
  13. Garges HP, Moody MA, Cotten CM et al. Neonatal meningitis: what is the correlation among cerebrospinal fluid cultures, blood cultures, and cerebrospinal fluid parameters? Pediatrics 2006; 117: 1094-100.
  14. Hristeva L, Booy R, Bowler I, Wilkinson AR. Prospective surveillance of neonatal meningitis. Arch Dis Child 1993; 69: 14-8.
  15. Holt DE, Halket S, de LJ, Harvey D. Neonatal meningitis in England and Wales: 10 years on. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2001; 84: F85-F89.
  16. Galiza EP, Heath PT. Improving the outcome of neonatal meningitis. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2009; 22: 229-34.
  17. Heath PT, Nik Yusoff NK, Baker CJ. Neonatal meningitis. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2003; 88: F173-F178.
  18. Siegal T, Pfeffer MR, Steiner I. Antibiotic therapy for infected Ommaya reservoir systems. Neurosurgery 1988; 22: 97-100.
  19. Cooper MD, Keeney RE, Lyons SF, Cheatle EL. Synergistic effects of ampicillin-aminoglycoside combinations on group B streptococci. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1979; 15: 484-6.
  20. Netherlands Reference Laboratory for Bacterial Meningitis (AMC/RIVM). Bacterial meningitis in the Netherlands Annual report 2010. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam; 2011.
  21. Odio CM, Puig JR, Feris JM et al. Prospective, randomized, investigator-blinded study of the efficacy and safety of meropenem vs. cefotaxime therapy in bacterial meningitis in children. Meropenem Meningitis Study Group. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1999; 18: 581-90.
  22. Brouwer MC, Heckenberg SG, de Gans J, Spanjaard L, Reitsma JB, van de Beek D. Nationwide implementation of adjunctive dexamethasone therapy for pneumococcal meningitis. Neurology 2010; 75: 1533-9.
  23. Heckenberg SG, de Gans J, Brouwer MC et al. Clinical features, outcome, and meningococcal genotype in 258 adults with meningococcal meningitis: a prospective cohort study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2008; 87: 185-92.
  24. Brouwer MC, van de Beek D, Heckenberg SG, Spanjaard L, de Gans J. Community-acquired Listeria monocytogenes meningitis in adults. Clin Infect Dis 2006; 43: 1233-8.
  25. Karageorgopoulos DE, Valkimadi PE, Kapaskelis A, Rafailidis PI, Falagas ME. Short versus long duration of antibiotic therapy for bacterial meningitis: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials in children. Arch Dis Child 2009; 94: 607-14.
  26. van de Beek D, Brouwer MC. No difference between short-course and long-course antibiotics for bacterial meningitis in children, but available evidence limited. Evid Based Med 2010; 15: 6-7.
  27. Molyneux E, Nizami SQ, Saha S et al. 5 versus 10 days of treatment with ceftriaxone for bacterial meningitis in children: a double-blind randomised equivalence study. Lancet 2011; 377: 1837-45.
  28. Tunkel AR, Hartman BJ, Kaplan SL et al. Practice guidelines for the management of bacterial meningitis. Clin Infect Dis 2004; 39: 1267-84.
  29. van der Meer H, van ZA, Spanjaard L, Van FM. [An infant with meningitis caused by resistant pneumococcus: infection despite vaccination]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2012; 156: A3806.
  30. Mitja O, Pigrau C, Ruiz I et al. Predictors of mortality and impact of aminoglycosides on outcome in listeriosis in a retrospective cohort study. J Antimicrob Chemother 2009; 64: 416-23.
  31. Lorber B. Listeriosis. Clin Infect Dis 1997; 24: 1-9.
  32. Red Book: 2009 report of the committee on infectious diseases. 28 ed. Elk Grove Village, IL, USA: American Academy of Pediatrics; 2009.
  33. Falagas ME, Bliziotis IA, Tam VH. Intraventricular or intrathecal use of polymyxins in patients with Gram-negative meningitis: a systematic review of the available evidence. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2007; 29: 9-25.
  34. Lozier AP, Sciacca RR, Romagnoli MF, Connolly ES, Jr. Ventriculostomy-related infections: a critical review of the literature. Neurosurgery 2008; 62 Suppl 2: 688-700.
  35. Mayhall CG, Archer NH, Lamb VA et al. Ventriculostomy-related infections. A prospective epidemiologic study. N Engl J Med 1984; 310: 553-9.
  36. Stenager E, Gerner-Smidt P, Kock-Jensen C. Ventriculostomy-related infections--an epidemiological study. Acta Neurochir (Wien ) 1986; 83: 20-3.
  37. Coplin WM, Avellino AM, Kim DK, Winn HR, Grady MS. Bacterial meningitis associated with lumbar drains: a retrospective cohort study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1999; 67: 468-73.
  38. Lyke KE, Obasanjo OO, Williams MA, O'Brien M, Chotani R, Perl TM. Ventriculitis complicating use of intraventricular catheters in adult neurosurgical patients. Clin Infect Dis 2001; 33: 2028-33.
  39. Wong GK, Poon WS, Wai S, Yu LM, Lyon D, Lam JM. Failure of regular external ventricular drain exchange to reduce cerebrospinal fluid infection: result of a randomised controlled trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002; 73: 759-61.
  40. Pfisterer W, Muhlbauer M, Czech T, Reinprecht A. Early diagnosis of external ventricular drainage infection: results of a prospective study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2003; 74: 929-32.
  41. Park P, Garton HJ, Kocan MJ, Thompson BG. Risk of infection with prolonged ventricular catheterization. Neurosurgery 2004; 55: 594-9.
  42. Arabi Y, Memish ZA, Balkhy HH et al. Ventriculostomy-associated infections: incidence and risk factors. Am J Infect Control 2005; 33: 137-43.
  43. Schade RP, Schinkel J, Visser LG, Van Dijk JM, Voormolen JH, Kuijper EJ. Bacterial meningitis caused by the use of ventricular or lumbar cerebrospinal fluid catheters. J Neurosurg 2005; 102: 229-34.
  44. Ohrstrom JK, Skou JK, Ejlertsen T, Kosteljanetz M. Infected ventriculostomy: bacteriology and treatment. Acta Neurochir (Wien ) 1989; 100: 67-9.
  45. Vinchon M, Dhellemmes P. Cerebrospinal fluid shunt infection: risk factors and long-term follow-up. Childs Nerv Syst 2006; 22: 692-7.
  46. Conen A, Walti LN, Merlo A, Fluckiger U, Battegay M, Trampuz A. Characteristics and treatment outcome of cerebrospinal fluid shunt-associated infections in adults: a retrospective analysis over an 11year period. Clin Infect Dis 2008; 47: 73-82.
  47. Walters BC, Hoffman HJ, Hendrick EB, Humphreys RP. Cerebrospinal fluid shunt infection. Influences on initial management and subsequent outcome. J Neurosurg 1984; 60: 1014-21.
  48. Filka J, Huttova M, Tuharsky J, Sagat T, Kralinsky K, Krcmery V, Jr. Nosocomial meningitis in children after ventriculoperitoneal shunt insertion. Acta Paediatr 1999; 88: 576-8.
  49. Kestle JR, Garton HJ, Whitehead WE et al. Management of shunt infections: a multicenter pilot study. J Neurosurg 2006; 105: 177-81.
  50. Sacar S, Turgut H, Toprak S et al. A retrospective study of central nervous system shunt infections diagnosed in a university hospital during a 4-year period. BMC Infect Dis 2006; 6:43.: 43.
  51. Korinek AM, Baugnon T, Golmard JL, van Effenterre R, Coriat P, Puybasset L. Risk factors for adult nosocomial meningitis after craniotomy: role of antibiotic prophylaxis. Neurosurgery 2008; 62 Suppl 2: 532-9.
  52. McClelland S, III, Hall WA. Postoperative central nervous system infection: incidence and associated factors in 2111 neurosurgical procedures. Clin Infect Dis 2007; 45: 55-9.
  53. Aucoin PJ, Kotilainen HR, Gantz NM, Davidson R, Kellogg P, Stone B. Intracranial pressure monitors. Epidemiologic study of risk factors and infections. Am J Med 1986; 80: 369-76.
  54. Kourbeti IS, Jacobs AV, Koslow M, Karabetsos D, Holzman RS. Risk factors associated with postcraniotomy meningitis. Neurosurgery 2007; 60: 317-25.
  55. Federico G, Tumbarello M, Spanu T et al. Risk factors and prognostic indicators of bacterial meningitis in a cohort of 3580 postneurosurgical patients. Scand J Infect Dis 2001; 33: 533-7.
  56. Wang KW, Chang WN, Huang CR et al. Post-neurosurgical nosocomial bacterial meningitis in adults: microbiology, clinical features, and outcomes. J Clin Neurosci 2005; 12: 647-50.
  57. Zarrouk V, Vassor I, Bert F et al. Evaluation of the management of postoperative aseptic meningitis. Clin Infect Dis 2007; 44: 1555-9.
  58. Baltas I, Tsoulfa S, Sakellariou P, Vogas V, Fylaktakis M, Kondodimou A. Posttraumatic meningitis: bacteriology, hydrocephalus, and outcome. Neurosurgery 1994; 35: 422-6.
  59. Infection in neurosurgery working party of the british society for antimicrobial chemotherapy. The management of neurosurgical patients with postoperative bacterial or aseptic meningitis or external ventricular drain-associated ventriculitis. Infection in Neurosurgery Working Party of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. Br J Neurosurg 2000; 14: 7-12.
  60. Schreffler RT, Schreffler AJ, Wittler RR. Treatment of cerebrospinal fluid shunt infections: a decision analysis. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2002; 21: 632-6.
  61. Kim BN, Peleg AY, Lodise TP et al. Management of meningitis due to antibiotic-resistant Acinetobacter species. Lancet Infect Dis 2009; 9: 245-55.
  62. Pfausler B, Spiss H, Beer R et al. Treatment of staphylococcal ventriculitis associated with external cerebrospinal fluid drains: a prospective randomized trial of intravenous compared with intraventricular vancomycin therapy. J Neurosurg 2003; 98: 1040-4.
  63. Beller AJ, Sahar A, Praiss I. Brain abscess. Review of 89 cases over a period of 30 years. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1973; 36: 757-68.
  64. Berlit P, Fedel C, Tornow K, Schmiedek P. [Bacterial brain abscess--experiences with 67 patients]. Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr 1996; 64: 297-306.
  65. Carpenter J, Stapleton S, Holliman R. Retrospective analysis of 49 cases of brain abscess and review of the literature. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2007; 26: 1-11.
  66. Hakan T, Ceran N, Erdem I, Berkman MZ, Goktas P. Bacterial brain abscesses: an evaluation of 96 cases. J Infect 2006; 52: 359-66.
  67. Tattevin P, Bruneel F, Clair B et al. Bacterial brain abscesses: a retrospective study of 94 patients admitted to an intensive care unit (1980 to 1999). Am J Med 2003; 115: 143-6.
  68. Smith SJ, Ughratdar I, MacArthur DC. Never go to sleep on undrained pus: a retrospective review of surgery for intraparenchymal cerebral abscess. Br J Neurosurg 2009; 23: 412-7.
  69. Al Masalma M, Armougom F, Scheld WM et al. The expansion of the microbiological spectrum of brain abscesses with use of multiple 16S ribosomal DNA sequencing. Clin Infect Dis 2009; 48: 1169-78.
  70. de Lastours V, Kalamarides M, Leflon V et al. Optimization of bacterial diagnosis yield after needle aspiration in immunocompetent adults with brain abscesses. Neurosurgery 2008; 63: 362-7.
  71. Cavusoglu H, Kaya RA, Turkmenoglu ON, Colak I, Aydin Y. Brain abscess: analysis of results in a series of 51 patients with a combined surgical and medical approach during an 11-year period. Neurosurg Focus 2008; 24: E9.
  72. Goodkin HP, Harper MB, Pomeroy SL. Intracerebral abscess in children: historical trends at Children's Hospital Boston. Pediatrics 2004; 113: 1765-70.
  73. Le Moal G, Landron C, Grollier G et al. Characteristics of brain abscess with isolation of anaerobic bacteria. Scand J Infect Dis 2003; 35: 318-21.
  74. Sennaroglu L, Sozeri B. Otogenic brain abscess: review of 41 cases. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000; 123: 751-5.
  75. Barlas O, Sencer A, Erkan K, Eraksoy H, Sencer S, Bayindir C. Stereotactic surgery in the management of brain abscess. Surg Neurol 1999; 52: 404-10.
  76. Mamelak AN, Mampalam TJ, Obana WG, Rosenblum ML. Improved management of multiple brain abscesses: a combined surgical and medical approach. Neurosurgery 1995; 36: 76-85.
  77. O'Donoghue MA, Green HT, Shaw MD. Cerebral abscess on Merseyside 1980-1988. J Infect 1992; 25: 163-72.
  78. Tekkok IH, Erbengi A. Management of brain abscess in children: review of 130 cases over a period of 21 years. Childs Nerv Syst 1992; 8: 411-6.
  79. Renier D, Flandin C, Hirsch E, Hirsch JF. Brain abscesses in neonates. A study of 30 cases. J Neurosurg 1988; 69: 877-82.
  80. Chun CH, Johnson JD, Hofstetter M, Raff MJ. Brain abscess. A study of 45 consecutive cases. Medicine (Baltimore) 1986; 65: 415-31.
  81. Brook I. Bacteriology of intracranial abscess in children. J Neurosurg 1981; 54: 484-8.
  82. Shahzad K, Hamid MH, Khan MA, Malik N, Maqbool S. Brain abscess in children. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2005; 15: 609-11.
  83. de Louvois, ., Gortavai P, Hurley R. Bacteriology of abscesses of the central nervous system: a multicentre prospective study. Br Med J 1977; 2: 981-4.
  84. Jansson AK, Enblad P, Sjolin J. Efficacy and safety of cefotaxime in combination with metronidazole for empirical treatment of brain abscess in clinical practice: a retrospective study of 66 consecutive cases. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2004; 23: 7-14.
  85. Bartt R. Listeria and atypical presentations of Listeria in the central nervous system. Semin Neurol 2000; 20: 361-73.
  86. Roche M, Humphreys H, Smyth E et al. A twelve-year review of central nervous system bacterial abscesses; presentation and aetiology. Clin Microbiol Infect 2003; 9: 803-9.
  87. Mampalam TJ, Rosenblum ML. Trends in the management of bacterial brain abscesses: a review of 102 cases over 17 years. Neurosurgery 1988; 23: 451-8.
  88. Bagdatoglu H, Ildan F, Cetinalp E et al. The clinical presentation of intracranial abscesses. A study of seventy-eight cases. J Neurosurg Sci 1992; 36: 139-43.
  89. Miller ES, Dias PS, Uttley D. CT scanning in the management of intracranial abscess: a review of 100 cases. Br J Neurosurg 1988; 2: 439-46.
  90. Tonon E, Scotton PG, Gallucci M, Vaglia A. Brain abscess: clinical aspects of 100 patients. Int J Infect Dis 2006; 10: 103-9.
  91. Gomez J, Garcia-Vazquez E, Martinez PM et al. [Brain abscess. The experience of 30 years]. Med Clin (Barc ) 2008; 130: 736-9.
  92. Lunardi P, Acqui M, Ferrante L, Mastronardi L, Fortuna A. Non-traumatic brain abscess. Neurosurg Rev 1993; 16: 189-96.
  93. Nicolosi A, Hauser WA, Musicco M, Kurland LT. Incidence and prognosis of brain abscess in a defined population: Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1935-1981. Neuroepidemiology 1991; 10: 122-31.
  94. Richards J, Sisson PR, Hickman JE, Ingham HR, Selkon JB. Microbiology, chemotherapy and mortality of brain abscess in Newcastle-upon-Tyne between 1979 and 1988. Scand J Infect Dis 1990; 22: 511-8.
  95. Svanteson B, Nordstrom CH, Rausing A. Non-traumatic brain abscess. Epidemiology, clinical symptoms and therapeutic results. Acta Neurochir (Wien ) 1988; 94: 57-65.
  96. Danziger A, Price H, Schechter MM. An analysis of 113 intracranial infections. Neuroradiology 1980; 19: 31-4.
  97. Hilmani S, Riyahi S, Ibahioin K, Naja A, El KA, El AA. [Brain abscess (80 cases)]. Neurochirurgie 2009; 55: 40-4.
  98. Morgan H, Wood MW, Murphey F. Experience with 88 consecutive cases of brain abscess. J Neurosurg 1973; 38: 698-704.
  99. Carey ME, Chou SN, French LA. Long-term neurological residua in patients surviving brain abscess with surgery. J Neurosurg 1971; 34: 652-6.
  100. Rish BL, Caveness WF, Dillon JD, Kistler JP, Mohr JP, Weiss GH. Analysis of brain abscess after penetrating craniocerebral injuries in Vietnam. Neurosurgery 1981; 9: 535-41.
  101. Gruszkiewicz J, Doron Y, Peyser E, Borovich B, Schachter J, Front D. Brain abscess and its surgical management. Surg Neurol 1982; 18: 7-17.
  102. Bradley PJ, Manning KP, Shaw MD. Brain abscess secondary to otitis media. J Laryngol Otol 1984; 98: 1185-91.
  103. Ersahin Y, Mutluer S, Guzelbag E. Brain abscess in infants and children. Childs Nerv Syst 1994; 10: 1859.
  104. Schliamser SE, Backman K, Norrby SR. Intracranial abscesses in adults: an analysis of 54 consecutive cases. Scand J Infect Dis 1988; 20: 1-9.
  105. Mathisen GE, Meyer RD, George WL, Citron DM, Finegold SM. Brain abscess and cerebritis. Rev Infect Dis 1984; 6 Suppl 1: S101-S106.
  106. Shaw MD, Russell JA. Cerebellar abscess. A review of 47 cases. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1975; 38: 429-35.
  107. Nielsen H. Cerebral abscess in children. Neuropediatrics 1983; 14: 76-80.
  108. Hirsch JF, Roux FX, Sainte-Rose C, Renier D, Pierre-Kahn A. Brain abscess in childhood. A study of 34 cases treated by puncture and antibiotics. Childs Brain 1983; 10: 251-65.
  109. Moss SD, McLone DG, Arditi M, Yogev R. Pediatric cerebral abscess. Pediatr Neurosci 1988; 14: 291-6.
  110. Fischer EG, McLennan JE, Suzuki Y. Cerebral abscess in children. Am J Dis Child 1981; 135: 746-9.
  111. Dohrmann PJ, Elrick WL. Observations on brain abscess. Review of 28 cases. Med J Aust 1982; 2: 81-3.
  112. Sharma R, Mohandas K, Cooke RP. Intracranial abscesses: changes in epidemiology and management over five decades in Merseyside. Infection 2009; 37: 39-43.
  113. van Alphen HA, Dreissen JJ. Brain abscess and subdural empyema. Factors influencing mortality and results of various surgical techniques. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1976; 39: 481-90.
  114. Al MM, Armougom F, Scheld WM et al. The expansion of the microbiological spectrum of brain abscesses with use of multiple 16S ribosomal DNA sequencing. Clin Infect Dis 2009; 48: 1169-78.
  115. de LJ, Gortvai P, Hurley R. Antibiotic treatment of abscesses of the central nervous system. Br Med J 1977; 2: 985-7.
  116. Mayhall CG, Archer NH, Lamb VA et al. Ventriculostomy-related infections. A prospective epidemiologic study. N Engl J Med 1984; 310: 553-9.
  117. Stenager E, Gerner-Smidt P, Kock-Jensen C. Ventriculostomy-related infections--an epidemiological study. Acta Neurochir (Wien ) 1986; 83: 20-3.
  118. Ohrstrom JK, Skou JK, Ejlertsen T, Kosteljanetz M. Infected ventriculostomy: bacteriology and treatment. Acta Neurochir (Wien ) 1989; 100: 67-9.
  119. Coplin WM, Avellino AM, Kim DK, Winn HR, Grady MS. Bacterial meningitis associated with lumbar drains: a retrospective cohort study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1999; 67: 468-73.
  120. Lyke KE, Obasanjo OO, Williams MA, O'Brien M, Chotani R, Perl TM. Ventriculitis complicating use of intraventricular catheters in adult neurosurgical patients. Clin Infect Dis 2001; 33: 2028-33.
  121. Wong GK, Poon WS, Wai S, Yu LM, Lyon D, Lam JM. Failure of regular external ventricular drain exchange to reduce cerebrospinal fluid infection: result of a randomised controlled trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002; 73: 759-61.
  122. Pfisterer W, Muhlbauer M, Czech T, Reinprecht A. Early diagnosis of external ventricular drainage infection: results of a prospective study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2003; 74: 929-32.
  123. Park P, Garton HJ, Kocan MJ, Thompson BG. Risk of infection with prolonged ventricular catheterization. Neurosurgery 2004; 55: 594-9.
  124. Arabi Y, Memish ZA, Balkhy HH et al. Ventriculostomy-associated infections: incidence and risk factors. Am J Infect Control 2005; 33: 137-43.
  125. Leverstein-van Hall MA, Hopmans TE, van der Sprenkel JW et al. A bundle approach to reduce the incidence of external ventricular and lumbar drain-related infections. J Neurosurg 2010; 112: 345-53.
  126. Schade RP, Schinkel J, Visser LG, Van Dijk JM, Voormolen JH, Kuijper EJ. Bacterial meningitis caused by the use of ventricular or lumbar cerebrospinal fluid catheters. J Neurosurg 2005; 102: 229-34.
  127. Walters BC, Hoffman HJ, Hendrick EB, Humphreys RP. Cerebrospinal fluid shunt infection. Influences on initial management and subsequent outcome. J Neurosurg 1984; 60: 1014-21.
  128. Filka J, Huttova M, Tuharsky J, Sagat T, Kralinsky K, Krcmery V, Jr. Nosocomial meningitis in children after ventriculoperitoneal shunt insertion. Acta Paediatr 1999; 88: 576-8.
  129. Kestle JR, Garton HJ, Whitehead WE et al. Management of shunt infections: a multicenter pilot study. J Neurosurg 2006; 105: 177-81.
  130. Sacar S, Turgut H, Toprak S et al. A retrospective study of central nervous system shunt infections diagnosed in a university hospital during a 4-year period. BMC Infect Dis 2006; 6:43.: 43.
  131. Aucoin PJ, Kotilainen HR, Gantz NM, Davidson R, Kellogg P, Stone B. Intracranial pressure monitors. Epidemiologic study of risk factors and infections. Am J Med 1986; 80: 369-76.
  132. Kourbeti IS, Jacobs AV, Koslow M, Karabetsos D, Holzman RS. Risk factors associated with postcraniotomy meningitis. Neurosurgery 2007; 60: 317-25.
  133. Federico G, Tumbarello M, Spanu T et al. Risk factors and prognostic indicators of bacterial meningitis in a cohort of 3580 postneurosurgical patients. Scand J Infect Dis 2001; 33: 533-7.
  134. Wang KW, Chang WN, Huang CR et al. Post-neurosurgical nosocomial bacterial meningitis in adults: microbiology, clinical features, and outcomes. J Clin Neurosci 2005; 12: 647-50.
  135. Zarrouk V, Vassor I, Bert F et al. Evaluation of the management of postoperative aseptic meningitis. Clin Infect Dis 2007; 44: 1555-9.

Autorisatiedatum en geldigheid

Laatst beoordeeld  : 01-01-2012

Laatst geautoriseerd  : 01-01-2012

Geplande herbeoordeling  :

Initiatief en autorisatie

Initiatief:
  • Stichting Werkgroep Antibioticabeleid
Geautoriseerd door:
  • Nederlandse Vereniging voor Kindergeneeskunde
  • Nederlandse Vereniging voor Medische Microbiologie
  • Nederlandse Vereniging voor Neurochirurgie
  • Nederlandse Vereniging voor Neurologie

Algemene gegevens

The Dutch Working Party on Antibiotic Policy (SWAB; Stichting Werkgroep Antibiotica Beleid), established by the Dutch Society for Infectious Diseases (VIZ), the Dutch Society of Medical Microbiology (NVMM) and the Dutch Society for Hospital Pharmacists (NVZA), develops evidence-based guidelines for the use of antibiotics in hospitalized patients in order to optimize the quality of prescribing, thus, contributing to the containment of antimicrobial drug costs and resistance. By means of the development of national guidelines, SWAB offers local antibiotic and formulary committees a guideline for the development of their own, local antibiotic policy.  These are the first SWAB guidelines on bacterial central nervous system infections. It is developed according to the Evidence Based Guideline Development method (EBRO; www.cbo.nl). The AGREE criteria

(www.agreecollaboration.org) provided a structured framework both for the development and the assessment of the draft guideline. 

 

Relationship between the SWAB Guidelines and the 2012 Guidelines on Meningitis by the Dutch Society for Neurology (Nederlandse Vereniging voor Neurologie)

The SWAB guidelines cover the antimicrobial therapy in children and adults with bacterial meningitis, brain abscesses and tuberculous meningitis. They do not cover other treatment components of bacterial meningitis, such as corticosteroids, osmotic agents and anticoagulants.2 This is discussed extensively in the 2012 guidelines by the Dutch Society for Neurology (Nederlandse Vereniging voor Neurologie). The Nederlandse Vereniging voor Neurologie guidelines adopted the SWAB guidelines on meningitis to be the treatment part of their meningitis guidelines.

Doel en doelgroep

Core issues on cryptococcal meningitis are extensively discussed in the 2008 SWAB guidelines on fungal infections. Diagnostics for bacterial meningitis are briefly discussed in the introduction, but not systematically reviewed in these guidelines. Encephalitis falls outside the scope of these guidelines.

For this guideline we made a distinction based on the setting in which bacterial meningitis was acquired: community-acquired versus nosocomial. Further, we provide recommendations for empirical antimicrobial therapy for clinical subgroups of bacterial meningitis patients. The choice of initial antimicrobial therapy for these subgroups is based on the bacteria most commonly causing the disease, taking into account the patient’s age and clinical setting, and patterns of antimicrobial susceptibility. After the results of culture and susceptibility testing have become available, antimicrobial therapy can be modified for optimal treatment. 

Samenstelling werkgroep

Preparatory Committee: Dr. M.C. Brouwer, Drs. S.G.B. Heckenberg, Dr. G.T.J. van Well (Nederlandse Vereniging voor Kindergeneeskunde), Dr. A. Brouwer (Vereniging voor Infectieziekten), Dr. E.J. Delwel (Nederlandse Vereniging voor Neurochirurgie), Dr. L. Spanjaard (Nederlandse Vereniging voor Medisch Microbiologie), Prof. dr. D. van de Beek (Nederlandse Vereniging voor Neurologie), Prof. dr. J.M. Prins (SWAB).

Methode ontwikkeling

Evidence based

Werkwijze

Twelve key questions were formulated concerning the antibiotic treatment of bacterial central nervous system infections. Using several data sources (see data sources) conclusions were drawn, with their specific level of evidence, according to the CBO grading system adopted by SWAB (Table 1).1

Subsequently, specific recommendations were formulated. Each key question will be answered in a separate chapter. 

 

Table 1a

Methodological quality of individual studies.1

 

 

Intervention

Etiology, prognosis

A1 

Systematic review of at least two independent A2-level studies 

A2 

Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT) of sufficient methodological quality and power 

Prospective cohort study with sufficient power and with adequate confounding corrections 

Comparative Study lacking the same quality

as mentioned at A2 (including patientcontrol and cohort studies) 

Prospective cohort study lacking the same quality as mentioned at A2, retrospective cohort study or patient-control study 

Non-comparative study 

Expert opinion 

 

Table 1b

Level of evidence of conclusions

 

 

Conclusions based on 

Study of level A1 or at least two independent studies of level A2 

One study of level A2 or at least two independent studies of level B 

One study of level B or C 

Expert opinion 

Zoekverantwoording

Zoekacties zijn opvraagbaar. Neem hiervoor contact op met de Richtlijnendatabase.

Volgende:
Nosocomiale bacteriële meningitis